Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
2.
World Neurosurg ; 142: e434-e439, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-715005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has created challenges to neurosurgical patient care. Despite editorials evaluating neurosurgery responses to 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), data reporting effects of COVID-19 on neurosurgical case volume, census, and resident illness are lacking. The aim of this study was to present a real-world analysis of neurosurgical volumes, resident deployment, and unique challenges encountered during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 outbreak peak in New York City. METHODS: Daily census and case volume data were prospectively collected throughout the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 outbreak in spring 2020. Neurosurgical census was compared against COVID-19 system-wide data. Neurosurgical cases during the crisis were analyzed and compared with 7-week periods from 2019 and early 2020. Resident deployment and illness were reviewed. RESULTS: From March 16, 2020, to May 5, 2020, residents participated in 72 operations and 69 endovascular procedures compared with 448 operations and 253 endovascular procedures from January 2020 to February 2020 and 530 operations and 340 endovascular procedures from March 2019 to May 2019. There was a 59% reduction in neurosurgical census during the outbreak (median 24 patients, 2.75 average total cases daily). COVID-19 neurosurgical admissions peaked in concert with the system-wide pandemic. Three residents demonstrated COVID-19 symptoms (no hospitalizations occurred) for a total 24 workdays lost (median 7 workdays). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide real-world guidance on neurosurgical infrastructure needs during a COVID-19 outbreak. While redeployment to support the COVID-19 response was required, a significant need remained to continue to provide critical neurosurgical service.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Internship and Residency , Neurosurgery/education , Neurosurgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Endovascular Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neurosurgery/organization & administration , New York City/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Stroke ; 51(9): e215-e218, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-636399

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Young patients with malignant cerebral edema have been shown to benefit from early decompressive hemicraniectomy. The impact of concomitant infection with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and how this should weigh in on the decision for surgery is unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all COVID-19-positive patients admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit for malignant edema monitoring. Patients with >50% of middle cerebral artery involvement on computed tomography imaging were considered at risk for malignant edema. RESULTS: Seven patients were admitted for monitoring of whom 4 died. Cause of death was related to COVID-19 complications, and these were either seen both very early and several days into the intensive care unit course after the typical window of malignant cerebral swelling. Three cases underwent surgery, and 1 patient died postoperatively from cardiac failure. A good outcome was attained in the other 2 cases. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19-positive patients with large hemispheric stroke can have a good outcome with decompressive hemicraniectomy. A positive test for COVID-19 should not be used in isolation to exclude patients from a potentially lifesaving procedure.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/complications , Brain Ischemia/surgery , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Decompressive Craniectomy/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Stroke/complications , Stroke/surgery , Adult , Brain Edema/complications , Brain Edema/surgery , Brain Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19 , Cause of Death , Clinical Decision-Making , Critical Care , Decompressive Craniectomy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Neurooncol ; 148(2): 211-219, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-175869

ABSTRACT

The challenges of neurosurgical patient management and surgical decision-making during the 2019-2020 COVID-19 worldwide pandemic are immense and never-before-seen in our generation of neurosurgeons. In this case-based formatted report, we present the Mount Sinai Hospital (New York, NY) Department of Neurosurgery institutional experience in the epicenter of the pandemic and the guiding principles for our current management of intracranial, skull base, and spine tumors. The detailed explanations of our surgical reasoning for each tumor case is tailored to assist neurosurgeons across the United States as they face these complex operative decisions put forth by the realities of the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Neurosurgery/standards , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Triage/standards , Brain Neoplasms/virology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Disease Management , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Spinal Neoplasms/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL